The purpose of this study was to determine validity and reliability of the Repeated Agility-based anaerobic test (RAAT) and Running- based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST). The subjects were selected randomly (n=36) among male P.E students. They performed the RAAT and RAST test. The Wingate anaerobic test also used as criteria test. The data was analyzed by regression pattern (p<0.05). The result showed that the correlation of RAAT and Wingate test wasn’t significant only in absolute and relative minimum power (absolute minimum power p=0.08 r=0.29, relative minimum power p=0.5 r=0.12) but was significant in other variables (absolute maximum power p=0.001 r=0.73, relative maximum power p=0.01 r=0.40, absolute mean power p=0.001 r=0.83, relative mean power p=0.03 r=0.37, Fatigue index r=0.33 p=0.05). On the other hand, the correlation of RAAT and RAST was significant (absolute maximum power r=0.88 p=0.001, relative maximum power p=0.001 r=0.77, absolute mean power r=0.91 p=0.001, relative mean power p=0.001 r=0.80, absolute minimum power r=0.77 p=0.001, relative minimum power p=0.003 r=0.47, Fatigue index r=0.43 p=0.009). Reliability of RAAT and RAST test showed in all aspect (absolute maximum power’s reliability in RAAT r=0.96 p=0.001, absolute maximum power’s reliability in RAST r=0.97 p=0.001). The results showed that the RAAT has sufficient validity. Also the RAAT and RAST test are Reliable.